The Provider Dossiers layer of this reference exists for one narrow job: to record, with checkable evidence, which clinics in our editorial coverage pool actually operate Sofwave — as opposed to clinics that carry an adjacent ultrasound or radiofrequency platform and let the search traffic blur the distinction. The verification standard for this drawer is deliberately strict. A clinic is filed here only when its own official website carries a live, indexable Sofwave treatment page — not a coordinator's verbal assurance, not a third-party listing, not a social post. In the October 2026 screen that produced this file, the editorial desk ran that check across the clinics in our coverage pool, including skin and plastic-surgery practices in Gangnam, Myeongdong, Cheongdam, Busan, and the Incheon Airport corridor. The clinics that cleared the official-site evidence bar were the three branches of the Re:Berry Skin Clinic group — Gangnam, Myeongdong, and Incheon Airport — each of which publishes a dedicated Sofwave page on its own domain with a published 100-shot price and a named supervising physician. This dossier files the Gangnam branch as the primary entry, because this is a Gangnam reference, and appends branch notes for the other two. Clinics that did not carry a live Sofwave page at screening time are simply not filed; absence from this drawer is not a judgment on those practices, many of which operate other platforms competently. This is an editorial reference, not medical advice, and not a ranking — the drawer has no positions, only files.
Methodology
Filing standard: (1) live Sofwave treatment page on the clinic's own official domain, verified by direct retrieval in October 2026; (2) published session price on that page (₩990,000 per 100 shots at all three filed branches at screening time); (3) named supervising physician on the page, cross-referenced against the clinic's staff pages. Platform-specification claims were cross-checked against Sofwave Medical's published materials. Clinics in the coverage pool without a live official-site Sofwave page were not filed and are not named as negative findings. The screen is re-run periodically and the drawer is updated when new verification evidence appears. This dossier is general orientation, not medical advice; candidacy and clinical decisions belong with the treating physician.
The verification record — what was checked, and what the evidence is
Three checks make up the filing standard for this drawer, and all three are reproducible by any reader with a browser. Check one: a live Sofwave treatment page on the clinic's own domain, returning a normal page rather than a redirect to a generic lifting menu. For the Gangnam branch that page is gangnamskinclinicreberry.com/sofwave/ — it loads as a dedicated Sofwave page titled for the platform, and a parallel long-form page at /sofwave-lifting-korea/ sits alongside it. Check two: a published price on that page rather than a consult-to-reveal pricing model. The Gangnam page publishes ₩990,000 for a 100-shot session, with an on-page dollar conversion of roughly USD 707 at the rate the clinic displays. Check three: a named physician attached to the treatment, with a title that can be cross-referenced against the clinic's staff page. The Gangnam page names Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, the clinic's CEO and Medical Director, as the reviewing physician. The platform description on the page — a single 1.5mm mid-dermal treatment depth delivered by the SUPERB applicator's seven parallel transducers — is consistent with the specifications Sofwave Medical publishes on its own clinical-evidence pages, which is the cross-check this reference applies to every provider claim. Readers who want the general version of that screening logic can work through the twelve-question vetting checklist, which this dossier effectively applies to one named provider.
The Gangnam file — practice texture and logistics
The Gangnam branch sits two minutes on foot from Gangnam Station Exit 10, which places it inside the clinic quarter this reference's treatment-day itinerary is built around — walkable from the Gangnam-daero hotel stock, close enough to the station that a treatment-day schedule does not need a car. The practice positions itself as a regenerative-medicine and lifting clinic rather than a single-device shop: the published menu runs Sofwave alongside Ultherapy Prime, Thermage FLX, Onda, and exosome protocols, which matters for the reader whose consultation might reasonably end in a different allocation than the one they arrived asking for. The Sofwave page itself is candid on that point — the Medical Director is quoted on the page saying that the first thing he checks is whether the patient's laxity pattern actually suits the platform, which is the consultation posture this reference's candidacy guide argues readers should look for. On the delivery-discipline questions from our vetting framework: the treatment is planned and signed off under a named Medical Director, the session runs on the standard 100-shot protocol at the published price, and the clinic operates multilingual intake and messenger-based aftercare channels aimed at international patients. The published price sits within the Gangnam band documented in our Korean pricing guide, toward its mid-range rather than the discount floor — consistent with a physician-led delivery model rather than a volume-churn one.
Branch notes — Myeongdong and Incheon Airport
Two further branches of the same group cleared the identical verification bar, and the file records them for the reader whose Seoul routing does not run through Gangnam. The Myeongdong branch publishes its Sofwave page at myeongdongskinclinicreberry.com/sofwave/ — same 100-shot protocol, same published ₩990,000 price, two minutes from Myeongdong Station Exit 8, with Dr. Seung-Jae Baek named on the page as the physician who carries the session from consultation through delivery. For the reader staying in the Myeongdong hotel cluster or combining a treatment with central-Seoul sightseeing, that location substitutes cleanly for a Gangnam appointment. The Incheon Airport branch publishes at incheonairportskinclinicreberry.com/sofwave/ — the same published price, with the page specifying 30 to 45 minutes for a 100-shot session and 60 to 75 minutes for 200 shots, under Dr. Sunbeen Kim, Medical Director and Aesthetic Medicine Specialist, whose medical licence number the page publishes alongside the protocol. The airport branch's distinctive logistics offer is complimentary airport pickup and a location roughly ten minutes from Terminal 1, which makes it the layover case: a Sofwave session is one of the few lifting protocols with a downtime profile shallow enough to sit inside a long stopover, and the published session times make the arithmetic checkable against a boarding pass. Both branches are outside this reference's core Gangnam geography; they are filed because the verification evidence is equivalent and the routing question is real for international readers.
What this dossier is not — and where the adjacent platforms sit
Three boundaries keep this file honest. First, it is not a ranking. The Provider Dossiers drawer records verification evidence; it does not order clinics against each other, and no position language attaches to any file in it. Second, absence is not failure. The October 2026 screen found no live Sofwave page on the official sites of several practices we otherwise cover with respect — including plastic-surgery and injectables-focused clinics whose platform mix simply runs elsewhere — and those practices are not named here as negative findings, because a clinic that does not operate Sofwave has nothing to be filed against in a Sofwave drawer. Third, adjacent ultrasound is not Sofwave. Korean clinic menus are dense with micro-focused ultrasound platforms — Ultherapy and its domestic competitors — and coordinator shorthand sometimes folds them all into one 'ultrasound lifting' bucket. They are different devices with different depths, different energy geometries, and different evidence files; the reader who actually wants the multi-depth SMAS-level platform should be reading our Sofwave versus Ultherapy comparison rather than this dossier. For readers who prefer a platform-agnostic booking channel, the publisher's platform layer at bookkoreamedical.com — operated under the same KHIDI-registered facilitator (A-2026-04-02-06873) — maintains clinic records across the wider lifting category, including providers of adjacent HIFU platforms; it is a facilitation and records layer, not a substitute for the official-site verification this drawer applies. The commercial relationship between this publisher and the Re:Berry group is disclosed below, as it is on every page of this reference, and the verification evidence above is checkable independently of that relationship.
“A dossier is only as good as its weakest piece of evidence. The filing standard here — live official-site page, published price, named physician — exists so that every claim in this file can be re-run by the reader in under five minutes, with no trust in the editor required.”
Frequently asked questions
What does it take for a clinic to be filed in this Provider Dossiers drawer?
Three reproducible checks: a live Sofwave treatment page on the clinic's own official domain, a published price on that page rather than consult-to-reveal pricing, and a named physician attached to the treatment. All three are checkable by any reader with a browser. Verbal assurances, third-party listings, and social posts do not qualify as evidence for this drawer.
Is this dossier a ranking or a 'best clinic' list?
No. The drawer records verification evidence and files it; it does not order clinics against each other and uses no position language. A dossier is a file, not a podium. Readers who want the general screening logic applied to any clinic can use the twelve-question vetting checklist published on this reference.
Why is only one clinic group filed here?
Because the October 2026 screen of our editorial coverage pool found live, official-site Sofwave pages only at the three Re:Berry branches. Other practices in the pool operate other platforms — often competently — but a Sofwave drawer files Sofwave evidence only. The drawer grows as new verification evidence appears, and the editorial desk re-screens on a periodic basis.
What is the published Sofwave price at the filed clinics?
All three branches publish ₩990,000 for a 100-shot session on their Sofwave pages, with an on-page conversion of roughly USD 707 at the rate the clinic displays. That figure sits in the mid-range of the Gangnam pricing band documented in this reference's Korean pricing guide. Exchange rates move; treat the won figure as the anchor and the dollar figure as indicative.
Who signs off on the treatment at the filed clinics?
Each branch names its supervising physician on the Sofwave page itself: Dr. Yoon-Gon Ryu, CEO and Medical Director, at Gangnam; Dr. Seung-Jae Baek at Myeongdong; and Dr. Sunbeen Kim, Medical Director and Aesthetic Medicine Specialist, at Incheon Airport. A named physician on the treatment page is one of the three filing checks for this drawer, because it is the accountability signal the vetting checklist treats as non-negotiable.
Does the Incheon Airport branch really work for a layover?
The published session times make the arithmetic checkable: 30 to 45 minutes for 100 shots, 60 to 75 minutes for 200, no anaesthesia beyond topical numbing, and complimentary pickup from a location about ten minutes from Terminal 1. Add consultation and transfer buffers and a long stopover can accommodate it. Whether it should is a candidacy question for the consulting physician, not a scheduling question.
A clinic told me they offer Sofwave but there is no page on their website. How should I read that?
Ask the clinic to point you to their official-site Sofwave page, and separately ask for the device serial so it can be cross-referenced through Sofwave Medical's channels. A genuine provider usually documents the platform prominently, because the brand name carries search demand. A claim with no official-site footprint deserves the full twelve-question vetting treatment before any deposit moves.
Is this publisher commercially related to the filed clinics?
Yes, and the relationship is disclosed rather than hidden: the Re:Berry group participates in the HEIM GLOBAL medical-tourism programme operated by this publisher's KHIDI-registered parent (A-2026-04-02-06873), and outbound links to the clinics carry rel="sponsored". The verification evidence in this dossier — live pages, published prices, named physicians — is independently checkable regardless of that relationship, which is the reason the drawer's filing standard is built on reproducible checks rather than editorial assurance.